centered image

centered image

Most Antidepressants Don’t Work On Kids and Teens, study finds

Discussion in 'Psychiatry' started by dr.omarislam, Dec 10, 2017.

  1. dr.omarislam

    dr.omarislam Golden Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2017
    Messages:
    2,041
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    4,075
    Gender:
    Male
    Practicing medicine in:
    Egypt

    [​IMG]

    Several doctors warned that patients shouldn’t stop taking their medications because of this study. Abruptly stopping medication can cause problems, including suicidal thinking. And some individuals might still benefit from the other drugs, Cipriani said.

    “If the patient’s responding to one treatment, they have to keep the treatment, of course. But on average, if I have to start a treatment, probably the best one is fluoxetine [Prozac] and not the others,” Cipriani said.

    Medication as the only option
    The new paper, a so-called meta-analysis, looked at 34 previously conducted studies. Those studies included more than 5,200 children and teens who took one of 14 antidepressants or a placebo an average of 8 weeks. The study did not consider long-term use of the drugs because there hasn’t been enough previous research to analyze, Cipriani said.

    Although several of the studies claimed to include patients as young as 6, Cipriani said there was virtually no data on children younger than 9.

    Dr. Carl Bell, a community psychiatrist and clinical professor emeritus at the University of Illinois at Chicago, said that until recently, he doesn’t remember seeing children younger than 13 who were suicidal or severely depressed. “I don’t know what happened, but now I see it all the time,” he said.

    In his experience, antidepressants work well on his preteen and adolescent patients.

    Bell said he would be happy to refer his inner-city patients to social services and therapy, but they’re “pretty much nonexistent” in the communities he serves. “That only leaves one choice,” he said: medications.

    Questioning methods
    Others raised concerns about the methods used to conduct the study.

    Prozac looked the best merely because it has been the subject of the most research, said Dr. Maurizio Fava, a psychiatric researcher at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.

    “I think the conclusion is a conclusion that is biased,” he said.

    Many of the other drugs would have been seen as effective if the study’s authors had properly considered the impact of placebos, he said. Because of the powerful placebo effect in treating depression, only a small number of participants in each of the 34 studies would have shown a benefit beyond the placebo. Only a large study, or multiple studies considering the same drug — as was available for Prozac — would show a benefit, Fava said.

    Sixty-five percent of the studies were sponsored by pharmaceutical companies, but Cipriani said he was able to use statistical manipulations to reduce any company bias.

    “I think our data are quite robust. However, we cannot rule out the possibility of sponsorship bias,” said Cipriani, who has earned fees as an expert witness for a generic drug manufacturer that makes some antidepressants. Only one of the paper’s 19 authors reported receiving personal and grant funding from large pharmaceutical companies.

    More research is needed on the causes of depression in children and teens and on the longterm use of antidepressants, Cipriani said.

    “The message is, medication should not be an easy answer to the problem of major depression,” Cipriani said, “But at the same time, we have a tool which is effective, so if needed, let’s use it.”

    source
     

    Add Reply

Share This Page

<