centered image

Pfizer Vaccine Only Slightly Less Effective Against Key S. African Mutations - Study

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by The Good Doctor, Jan 29, 2021.

  1. The Good Doctor

    The Good Doctor Golden Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2020
    Messages:
    15,161
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    12,195
    Gender:
    Female

    Pfizer Inc and BioNTech's COVID-19 vaccine appeared to lose only a small bit of effectiveness against an engineered virus with three key mutations from the new coronavirus variant found in South Africa, according to a laboratory study conducted by the U.S. drugmaker.

    The study by Pfizer and scientists from the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), which has not yet been peer-reviewed, showed a less than two-fold reduction in antibody titer levels, indicating the vaccine would likely be effective in neutralizing a virus with the so-called E484K and N501Y mutations found in the South African variant.

    [​IMG]

    The study, published on the bioRxiv website, was conducted on blood taken from people who had received the vaccine. Its findings are limited because it does not look at the full set of mutations found in the new South African variant.

    While these findings don't indicate the need for a new vaccine to address the emerging variants, Pfizer and BioNTech are prepared to respond if a variant of SARS-CoV-2 shows evidence of escaping immunity by the COVID-19 vaccine, the companies said in a statement on Wednesday.

    The scientists are currently engineering a virus with the full set of mutations and expect to have results from that in around two weeks, according to Pei-Yong Shi, the study's senior author and a professor at UTMB.

    The results are more encouraging than those of another non-peer-reviewed study from scientists at Columbia University earlier on Wednesday, which used a slightly different method to engineer experimental viruses with the full set of mutations, and showed antibodies generated by the vaccines were significantly less effective against the South Africa variant.

    One possible reason for the difference could be that the Pfizer findings are based on an engineered coronavirus, and the Columbia study used a pseudovirus based on the vesicular stomatitis virus, a different type of virus, UTMB's Shi said. He said he believes that findings in pseudoviruses should be validated using the real virus.

    The UTMB study also showed even better results against several key mutations from the highly transmissible UK variant of the virus. Shi said they were also working on an engineered virus with the full set of mutations from that variant as well.

    —Reuters Staff

    Source
     

    Add Reply

Share This Page

<