ROBERTS: Some of the things I learned in medical school that were wrong I recently attended my 30th medical school reunion at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston. It was a grand time of reminiscing and reconnecting with war buddies from the trenches of medical school. Part of our reunion weekend included lectures on current hot topics, such as the absurdity and danger of the anti-vaccine movement. But the lecture most of us were anticipating was on what we were taught in medical school that turned out to be wrong. The topic itself was quite an admission from one of the most prestigious academic institutions in the world. I mean, everything science tells us is true, factual, indisputable and remains so forever, right? One example where the teaching of the time was wrong was peptic ulcer disease. When we started medical school, surgery for ulcers was common. Ulcers were thought to be caused by stress-induced excessive secretion of acid in the stomach. The surgical procedure known as antrectomy (removal of the distal end of the stomach) and vagotomy (cutting the nerves that lead to acid secretion) was performed basically to stop acid production. But this was not a small operation. Patients were often left with really unpleasant gastrointestinal issues such as nausea, vomiting after eating, and dumping syndrome (abdominal cramps and diarrhea after eating). What we now know is that ulcers quite often are caused by a bacterium known as H. pylori, which can be easily treated with an antibiotic — to kill the infection — and antacids. Not only was this revolutionary (and simple), but the medical establishment refused to believe it at first. There were many reasons, but it just didn’t fit what they thought they knew. It was, so they thought, a psychosomatic illness. And bacteria weren’t thought to be able to live in the stomach. The Australian doctor who co-led the discovery was so desperate to prove his theory that he even drank a cocktail of the bacteria to prove his point. History shows he was vindicated. The whole bacteria/ulcer connection was a radical idea at the time. Yet it was right, and the two who discovered it were awarded the Nobel Prize in 2005. In my own field of oncology, there has been significant progress over the last 30 years. We now cure 70 percent of cancer patients compared with just 50 percent a generation ago. It was still a fairly paternalistic time in medicine. You didn’t question what the doctor told you to do. Physicians were taught — wrongly — that we should treat all patients aggressively all the way up to the end of life; otherwise, we would be taking away hope and devastating our patients. In retrospect, it seems obvious that was a ridiculous and cruel assumption. Informed consent demands honesty. Hope cannot be reduced simply to wanting to live one more day at all cost, especially when ravaged by an incurable disease. What about hope for reconciliation with estranged family members? Hope for a pain- and symptom-free death? Hope to die at home surrounded by family and friends, not alone in an ICU? Of course, now we have an entire field of comfort care/palliative medicine — including hospice care — to help with end-of-life symptoms and care. Another example is less about what we were taught that was wrong than with what we just didn’t know. My class of 1987 started medical school in 1983. The AIDS epidemic was so new at that time that we didn’t even know what caused it. The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) — originally called HTLV-III, or human T-cell leukemia virus — wasn’t even called HIV until 1986. Fear and judgmentalism drove much of the public and academic response to this novel epidemic. We even had a classmate die of AIDS before the identification of the virus was made. These were scary times. With HIV/AIDS, we were living in and experiencing a time when urgent research and rapid discovery were needed to fight a terrible (and terribly misunderstood) disease. Our own fear and prejudice slowed that effort down. I am curious what we will admit to being wrong about when the current medical school graduates have their 30-year reunion in 2047. Perhaps a brilliant discovery about Alzheimer’s, for example, will turn the medical world upside down. That is an illness where everyone would rejoice in acknowledging what we either got wrong or just didn’t know. Of course, more or unique discoveries in the field of cancer prevention and treatment would be welcome. In any case, we must be willing to admit that we don’t know everything there is to know today, and that we just might be wrong about some things. However, in today’s political climate I am not holding my breath to hear a mea culpa from the scientific community any more than when H. pylori was discovered. Maybe I’m wrong ... Source
